Cases History & Status
OS 360/1996 & AS 369/2005
Shankar Hills Plot Purchasers Welfare Association (SHPPWA) with regd. No. 2210/1989 was established by Mr. P. Yellamanda. OS 360/1996 was filed by the association for a perpetual injunction against Pattadars and GPA holders, who were attempting to resell the sold out plots in Ac 460.06 Gts.
The claim was dismissed on 9/03/2005 because Mr. Yellamanda had no right to file individually, and no proof was submitted on behalf of the association.
Mr. Yellamanda appealed the decision in AS 369/2005 in the High Court, which is still pending.
- OS 60/2001
Service Links International Limited filed OS 60/2001 against Karunakar Chowdary , Pattadaars, GPA holder N. Rangareddy, Yellamanda, Shankar Hills Association, and Jai Hind Green Field Private Limited.
The suit was dismissed on 29/04/2008. - D5/3214/2001 – Association Representation to Collector
Shankar Hills Association filed representation in D5/3214/2001 to the Joint Collector.
An order on 6/01/2004 indicated that Pattadars had executed two GPAs and sold the plots. The MRO was directed to mutate the name of Shankar Hills.
The Darugpalli family filed WP 3123/2004 in the High Court against this order. The mutation was canceled as it applied only to agricultural land.
On 09/02/2011, the Joint Collector in File No. D1/1960/2010 informed the MRO that registering Shankar Hills Association’s name was illegal as per WP 3123/2004. - OS 907/2006, AS 338/2013 & OS 165/2011
Shankar Hills Association filed OS 907/2006 for a perpetual injunction against Pattadars and others. After the court’s rejection of OS 907/2006, mentioning that the Association doesn’t own the land, AS 338/2013 was filed in the High Court allowing the appeal and leading to the association’s amendment to include 1400 plot owners in OS 907/2006. Following which, the court granted perpetual injunction.
The appeal was withdrawn following a compromise in OS 165/2011 with some pattadars. - OS 165/2011 and AS 1159/2017
Eleven Pattadars filed OS 165/2011 for a perpetual injunction against the association. During this period, the association entered into an agreement with Sai Krishna Developers to resolve litigations. Sai Krishna Developers settled with the Pattadars, paying 13.60 crore rupees. Some IAs are still pending about this compromise.
The case AS 1159/2017 regarding this compromise is pending in the High Court. - B/1100/2017 – to update revenue records
Based on the OS 165/2011 compromise and B/1100/2017 proceedings, Shankar Hills Association received an order to update the Revenue records under the Revenue’s Land Records Updation Program.
The land in all 33 survey numbers was included in revenue land records as sold land. However, buyers in Acres filed approximately 16 writ petitions against these orders, which were dismissed as the revenue records were updated without notifying existing Pattadars. Later, Dharani records listed Pattadars as the owners of the already sold land. - OS 525/2021
In OS 525/2021, a compromise was reached with four pattadars of the Darugpalli family involving 100 plot owners. - WP 1863/2022 & WP 21643/2022
WP 1863/2022 and WP 21643/2022 led to the prohibition of plots’ registration in Dharani. Despite the prohibition, Srinidhi Group companies purchased approximately 200 acres from the Pattadars. - OS 54/2021: Jaihind Reddy’s suit claiming an agreement with 10 pattadars to buy 146 acres in 2013. The pattadars didn’t register the sale, leading to a court decree in favor of Jaihind Reddy.
- 12 Claims: Jaihind Reddy filed 12 suits (OS 394/2023, OS 400/2023, OS 401/2023, OS 412/2023, OS 413/2023, OS 419/2023, OS 420/2023, OS 421/2023, OS 463/2023, OS 712/ 2023, OS 713/2023, OS 714/2023) totaling 146 acres, related to documents sold by Pattadars after Dharani’s introduction. All companies involved in land purchases from Pattadars via Dharani are included in these cases for the cancellation of sale deeds.
- WP 41378/2022: An application filed by Jaihind Reddy to halt Dharani sale transactions in the decreed 146 acres. HE filed WP 41378/2022 in the High Court, as no decision was taken regarding prohibiting sale transactions in the 146 acres. The Collector issued Proceedings No. D1/935/2022 dated 03/07/2023, outlining the complete history of Shankar Hills.
- 7 Cases: 7 Cases related to family partition claims (OS 122/2021, OS 310/2022, OS 324/2022, OS 300/2022, OS 307/2022, OS 317/2022, OS 539/2022), and OS 54/2021 collusive decree of 146 acres bought by Jaihind Reddy from 10 pattadars.
- AS 1/2023 & AS 5/2023: Appeal suits filed by Galandi Subhash and Malabai Khandarkar respectively, challenging rights in the 146 acres decreed to Jaihind Reddy in OS 54/2021.
- EP 323/2022: Filed indicating the non-completion of sale registration by 10 Pattadars, currently pending.
- OS 511/2021: Specific performance suit by LVSR Farms Pvt Ltd against R. Mutyam Reddy & others for violating a sale agreement.
- OS 35/2020: Shankar Hills Association sought temporary injunction against Jai Hind Greenfields, Y Vikranth Reddy, R. Mutyam Reddy, and Lingareddy Venkata Subhash. Granted in IA 89, but IA 89 order disposed in CRP 817,825,834 & 835/2020.
- OS 125/2019: Case filed by Darugpalli Pattadar.
- OS 1537/2019: Suit by Balishetty Manemma, B. Sathemma against Jaihind Green Field Pvt. Ltd. for 6 acres.
- OS 1278/2013: Suit for perpetual injunction against Shankar Hills Association by Lingareddy Sunitha, Sunil, Subhash for 9 acres.
- OS 1480/2007: Suit for perpetual injunction against 80 owners by Kalidindi Manjulata Devi for 2 acres.
- OS 731/2007: Perpetual injunction suit against Shankar Hills Association by Kalidindi Manjulata Devi for 2 acres.